S Gorskov

  • Content count

  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won


Everything posted by S Gorskov

  1. Hi everyone, I have noticed that many new players and even some veterans complain about the long training required (excessively boring) for capital ships (BB, CV, SS) even in their lowest grade (D and C), of consequently they tend to abandon the game, to stop this "bleeding" my suggestion to the Developers would be to change the experience points of the crew necessary according to the grade of the ship; i.e 4000 for A / S, 3000 for B (except for DD, CL, CA "B" which should return to the normal level of their class) 2000 for C / D, or something similar, thanks anyway
  2. Hello ALL and ahoi Mike ๐Ÿ‘‹๐Ÿ‘‹,actually with the activation of the Research all our personal fleets are leveling out without having more than their own characteristics therefore I personally fully agree with such a mechanism that would still justify the existence of different Nations ๐Ÿ‘
  3. greetings to all of you, personally I find all the new repairing ships very amusing and interesting, so much so that I try to have at least one in each country, but, in my humble opinion, there is a problem with the yellow repairing "circle", the radius it is too narrow, instead of helping the large powerful allied ships we risk hindering them in evasive or combat maneuvers, it would be enough to increase the radius a little to make the use of these ships less stressful and more fun, they are the only ones ships that have introduced a sort of mission within the normal GBs (the "problem" of the 3000!!!!๐Ÿค”๐Ÿค” crew points necessary for the veteran status of the new repair CA "B" would also remain open), thanx in advance ๐Ÿ™‚๐Ÿ‘‹๐Ÿ‘‹
  4. Greetings to all, I'm not sure but I think there may be bugs in the new ships just released, I was lucky enough to get two new grade "B" CAs repairers but after the joy I found two problems, first: these CAs cannot be used in CA's operations (not bad for me because I have already finished everything but important for a new player, I think) and second: these new ships need twice the crew experience compared to normal CAs to get the status of veterans, this does not seem very right considering that these CAs are as powerful as any CA "C", only more are they repairers (a help for others rather than for themselves), I look forward to clarifications before spending double the gold for the veteran status, hello everyone and have fun ๐Ÿ‘‹๐Ÿ‘‹๐Ÿ™‚ and I know I started to be annoying with all these posts ๐Ÿ™‚๐Ÿ˜‰
  5. what to say more? totally agree, even if personally I am taking advantage of the situation and I use extensively just an SS :-)
  6. Greetings to all, I understand that it is not the right time to report a possible bug / error, since the developers are engaged in the important patch related to the "Battle Royale" and new grade "B" light ships, but I try equally to report what seems to be a mistake in the sequence of upgrades of the FCS related to the BB "Richelieu" grade "B", in the first upgrade the critical hit rises to 20%, in the second upgrade rises rightly to 25% but the third upgrade (mysteriously ) decreases to 20% again (as was the first), I try to attach also explicative screenshots, greetings
  7. Hello Vlad, i talk only for me, of course, personally I would be very happy to have your return to the game but, logically, it is not up to us, simple players, the faculty of this decision, if the "flaw" in the system has been fixed very well the Game Team could also give you another chance, I believe and I hope because, before this huge and stupid mistake (if you allow me), you were one of the most active and nice players in the game
  8. greetings to all, personally I had many doubts about the effectiveness of the armor in the "new" system, especially for the effectiveness of the 3rd upgrade thinking how much speed it costs, we also had discussions between players, so I decided to make a small test whose results I hope will be helpful to all players, with a my friend we made two trial duels, in one the ship Target, a BB Francesco Caracciolo grade B 2 stars complete, was without bulges, in the other had the bulge activated , "the opponent" chosen is the small SS HMS P type of the Royal Navy, just built, without any upgrade or star for the crew, from the results below you understand very well that the bulge really reduces the damage of the torpedoes by 45% declared (in the case of Caracciolo), the starting damage is about 5,700 to which we must subtract the reduction for the crew. without Bulge 4100 4900 4700 4400 4000 4800 6000 4700 (burning) with Bulge 2200 3300 2400 2200 2200 3800 2600 2300 ......... the Ships were in same perpendicular position (around) and at 0 speed in both test, of course others tests or comments are welcome ๐Ÿ™‚
  9. Greetings to all, of course I address the group of Developers, while being aware that you are under pressure for the new patch of March 7 I kindly ask you to intervene urgently on the WoF system, I explain: after the release of the "Research patch" the old system of level limits for the three types of WoF does not work very well, without prejudice to the 3 types (Beginners, Experts, Masters), my proposal would be to allow the WoF to all ships but activating the limits of "grade / tier ", ie Beginners all types of ship but maximum" C "; Experts still all types of ship but maximum "B", Masters still all types of ship without any grade limit, in my humble opinion this change would revitalize the whole system, last thing, I would leave the number limits unaltered, ie 3vs3, 5vs5, 10vs10.naturally I invite everyone to make alternative proposals, but always in my simple opinion it is quite clear that the system should be urgently reformed. bye all
  10. Hello, I try to answer with my modest English๐Ÿ™‚, almost all the ships (Italian ๐Ÿ‡ฎ๐Ÿ‡น and French๐Ÿ‡ซ๐Ÿ‡ท) that you can take in the Research are better than the "national ones", and in the search you find also your "normal" nationals but with the highest grade, if you can for the research follow this method, for DDs, CLs and CAs it seems that the best grade is "C", for the capital Ships (CVs, BBs, SSs) the best investment is from "B" +, I remind you that to get the "A" and the "S" you have to invest Gold (maybe it's better to try various investments with 50 to 150 gold + some resources). Having so many BP will allow you to complete the "Collections" and have many Gold in reward (second "yellow" icon with the drawing of the compass in Research Menu), improve the Research Center does NOT increase the possibilities of good BP but only increase the simple storage of them, about debris you find them in supply box (you cant choice, just you get random reward from box) or in daily Quests, but gather debris is enough easy now if you play often ( i think that "research parts of ships" are same thing that debris ๐Ÿค”), i hope this can you help, greetings
  11. Hello Everyone, we are all slowly getting used to the new armor system, in my personal opinion it is still too penalizing for all classes of surface ships but you could try to quickly fix the thing if the 3 armor slots were "free", ie no longer related to sequencing, it is clear to all players (I think) that the third level of the armor has a decisive importance for the survival of the ship, we do not understand why we must necessarily have the "belt" before , then the "deck" and finally the "Bulge"; if the program allows it would be desirable to have the 3 protection slots without sequential constraints or alternatively put the "bulge" as the first improvement. Personally I would prefer the free slots, so each player can really adapt the ship to its type of game (for example, those who love long-distance shots do not necessarily need the belt, they just need the deck, but who likes the close fight would prefer the belt but thinks that the deck is expendable), Greetings ALL and Happy New Year๐ŸŽ‰๐ŸŽ‰๐ŸŽ‰๐Ÿ™‚
  12. Hello my friend Dav ๐Ÿ‘‹๐Ÿ‘‹๐Ÿ™‚, btw, HNY๐ŸŽ‰๐ŸŽ‰๐ŸŽ‰, now with new armour system all armour protection are same in all Nations, no anymore is slightly advantage for RN, i think, greetings๐Ÿ‘‹
  13. Hello Black, Hello Polina, Hello all, it seems almost useless to repeat that I agree with everything, the situation is so ridiculous, the games are almost never fun, they are too long to always wait for the last SS (now even you have to wait for the SSs to finish theirs " duels "being more and more at stake), for players who do not want to use SSs the situation is unsustainable, personally it seems absurd to "obligate" all players to use only one type of ship greatly benefited actually almost invincible when there are other 5 categories that could be fun, I renew my request for months ago to create fun (imho) alternative room only for surface ships "all guns", quick but fun fights of DDs, CLs, CAs, BBs (this eventual new Battle room should have reduced reward like 80% and no supply box), please DEVs, think about this btw,in my humble opinion this new situation will also give the "coupe de grace" to the already dying system of the WoF (War of Fleets), never fully taken off, if you enemy team there are 2/3 good and experienced players of SSs who use (rightly in WoF) repairs Kits and smokes kits, you might as well give up at the start because they will be unsinkable (naturally if you do not have SS in your team ๐Ÿ˜‰ ๐Ÿ™‚)
  14. Greetings to all, I can only agree with the analysis of Paulus, Polina, Joseph, Blackdragon ........, in my modest opinion you managed to ruin this great and fun game in more steps later, it is useless to list all the mistakes made so far, but the latter could be a resounding "autogoal" (im european and football fan ๐Ÿ™‚) also for your business, having facilitated only a relatively small elite of players (SSs Players and partially CVs players ) you are penalizing the majority of your potential customers because at least 60/70% do not routinely use submarines (at least until now ๐Ÿ˜‰); omitting the injustice of this new situation that has made useless once again very expensive "S" ships and also "A" "cui prodest" (to whom benefits) all this? my dear Developers to follow the requests of a relatively small part of players (the SS players) are risking to lose the majority (especially the new players who can not have fun with very slow vessels and with the resistance of the "butter"), and how minimum to turn the game into a battles of only submarines with about 150 other ships prepared, detailed, designed but useless and not fun and therefore not usable because no more funny (this is a game, the target is earning for you but fun for us). please, carefull rethink all the situation that has been created. anyway Good Time in next Holiday to ALL ๐ŸŽ‰๐ŸŽ‰๐ŸŽ‰๐Ÿ™‚๐Ÿ™‚๐Ÿ‘‹ note with pleasure a good step forward with the correction of today (24/12/2018), for me it is not enough, I thought it would be more right -3 / -5 / -10 for the three types of armor and restore the master repair crew at least 50% ๐Ÿค”, anyway good move DEVs!
  15. Greetings to all, I'm not sure that we can talk about a bug but the situation of the new BB130 Lion II (RN) is really unusual and it is real trouble for all RN players, i think, I state that I have done a careful examination, I in addition to Lion II I already have the BB130 Musashi (IJN) and Spiral BB130 (SN), both operating with the maximum upgrades, both are certainly better than the previous BB120 "B" of the respective Nations, Musashi has 2180x9 with the primary cannons to which must be added an amazing 9000 damage secondary long range for each side , it is fast and manoeuvrable; the Spiral has 1880x12 (higher than the "old" P24), 2 powerful secondary turrets in the stern and an average AAW, more speed and more armor like all these "A", now the Lion II has none of this, has only a mediocre AAW and 2680x9 of maximum damage (remember at all that old BB QV have 2800x9), exceeded in this also by new Vanguard "B" (2102x12 with a lower reload also), the only small advantage compared to Vanguard are 3000 hull more, little, considering that one is a level 1 !!! and the other is a level 130 !!!, all the BB130 "A" have however "little" hull compared to the "A" of the Research, but this is another problem, my humble opinion is that the Lion needs be empowered with some particular ability (torpedoes or a strong secondary) or the individual damage must be increased to at least 2900/3000 to justify a commitment to use and upgrade this ship, Greeting and Happy Holiday in advance
  16. Hello everyone, for now confirm only first trouble (the hugeeee time to load log) , but i guess that soon i will know the second too๐Ÿ™‚
  17. Greetings to all, I think I found a bug in the management of skills for the BB StrasBourg "B" grade, as shown in the images there is no upgrade to the FCS (which exists in the "C") and the related screen does not allows you to have no information or use, while we are on the subject I also remember the inexplicable lack of any "ability" in the "national" BBs B grade, neither the Vanguard nor the H39 have AAW or Torps, I think (and hope) it's a bug, not a choice ๐Ÿค”
  18. Hello at ALL from "Dark Side" (copyright by Diddy ๐Ÿ™‚๐Ÿ‘‹) once again I renew my appeal to all the players, please fill the defense fleets, there is no excuse, all of us (except Diddy, the "hard and pure" ๐Ÿ˜„๐Ÿ˜„๐Ÿ˜‰), have many new ships from Research/Lottery, just putting large ships without skills or experience to favor the other players, is a mutual aid, the only way to easily gather, imho, greetings ๐Ÿ‘‹๐Ÿ‘‹
  19. I am a poor guy semi-illiterate but I have a great passion for the Naval Military History so I allow myself to give suggestions to try to improve this game with many potentials: (1) the crew already veteran should be able to move on the new ship of the same type (with a gold cost of at least 1000/2000 leaving the player the possibility to choose); (2) as I try to repeat for months we need more rooms, some easier for the "vetting" of new ships (regardless of the levels of the players who now no longer have any value) some without SS or CV; (3) No BBs or CVs should have torpedoes and (4) all BBs and CVs should have AAW (@Baldrick, Hello, one of the BB's duty in the US Task Force was the AAW protection for CVs because of the huge volume of fire); (5) some CAs but not everyone should keep the torpedoes; (6) SS should be "nerfing" (oh oh, now Helmut hate me ^^) both in speed and in resistance, I think many players are tired of SS master who attack with impunity on the surface, basically the SS was a very fragile,delicate and very slow machine in the real WWII; (7) in these times there is a real abuse in the use of kits of smoke and repair by some players, my proposal is that at least the smoke is recoverable with resources to try to balance the game (like 100.000 steel+10.000 fuel= 5 smokes); (8) think it is necessary the "nerfing" of some new BB (Bretagne and Lorraine mainly) absurdly OP (I do not speak for envy because I have both ^^, just for justice); (9) the reward of GBs for the crew experience should pass at least 20 per battle and compared to the damage inflicted on 1x5000 basis (or in other proportion, of course) this would invoke lazy players (like me) to get more involved in battles instead of launching the ship and doing something else (i read, others watch movies while playing๐Ÿ˜‰, sad, incorrect but true) in addition to these 9 points, I share many of the ideas of Baldrick, Paulus and Polina, more I ask, as always, the recovery of multiple fleets per account (I have already demonstrated how this rule does not stop neither "boosting" nor " spying "both easily implemented even now, this rule has only penalized the old players) and I would have two other generic tips, the removal of the fireworks button icon (remember many players use a" small "cell phone, the less stuff there is better) and a different visualization of the ships in port, by now that all these new ships scroll up to find the right one is already this a game in the game๐Ÿ™‚. greetings at all
  20. hahahaha ๐Ÿ˜„๐Ÿ˜„๐Ÿ˜„๐Ÿ˜„, Hello Diddy and Hello Miss A ๐Ÿ‘‹๐Ÿ‘‹
  21. Greetings to all, as you already know my English is weak, I do not have clear the situation in the answer I take the contradictions, just to know we are in" the last days of Pompeii", or there is a future for this game ???๐Ÿค”๐Ÿค”, I still different thousands of gold, in case I would like to consume them before the end ๐Ÿ™‚๐Ÿ™‚
  22. greetings to all, not modestly I think I am an easygoing and quiet person but now I'm really tired both of this game and the modes of communication (absent) between the Team of developers and this Forum and consequently with us players, here we are before another umpteenth patch not announced, not agreed, not discussed, ....., never once our suggestions are accepted !, at the moment I do not know the content of the patch yet, I noticed that the HA changes again and than is granted (inexplicably for me) a further 30% of damage to the torps planes of CV "A" 2 "S" ??, no comment on any improvements in the chat until i see, maybe this patch will improve the game (objectively we can not say the opposite "a priori") but it is this system so arbitrary and arrogant that context, for once you can hear the suggestions of those us who keep alive this game for 18 months !!๐Ÿ˜ค๐Ÿ˜ค, please Team read and follow (if possible) the Baldrick's suggestions๐Ÿ‘ PS, for one time my apologies Team, seems that you follow just one suggest about increase debris reward in daily quests๐Ÿ‘๐Ÿ‘, remain the trouble for way of communication between us, imho
  23. Hello everyone, another sad day for this game;๐Ÿ˜– those like me who do not know the wonderful language of Astom I try to translate, "Greetings to you, I deleted my profile in the game and I can no longer play, then say goodbye ....", great result, yet another triumph for the newly released patch, the list of the "fallen" is still longer, I hope not to break any privacy remembering Altavilla, Dav, Fubar, Astom, ....... a wonderful group of people and players who are dispersing, I sincerely hope for you (DEVs Team) that you have a lot of economic feedback to justify all this, personally I make the words of Baldrick and I hope to meet again Astom in other games (I doubt even if you can have a positive solution in this), btw @Baldrick and Diddy, in my opinion the game is unfixable by now, so many new ships released, the others players seems have (legitimately) much fun and many players dismantled yet the old outclassed national ships, it is to late for any change and we have lost in our personal battle, the King is dead, long live the King (a Clown King such as the new Clown ships), i return in super boring HA, the only one thing that again do in this game, almost, " Selam Kanka"๐Ÿ‘‹๐Ÿ‘‹๐Ÿ˜ญ
  24. Hello Baldrick and Paulus; of course we know that many BBs had torpedoes (only those built or designed before the "30s"), but the fundamental difference is that they never used them in WWII (apart from the controversial Rodney / Bismarck case), while for CAs equipped with torpedoes the use is widely documented, and yes the SS 400 had supplied attack aircraft (idro) for the operation "Panama Canal", anyway those interesting disquisitions would be very interesting if we were not faced with a total rupture and abandonment,i point out that the reward of the debris (btw, useless heavier imho ) seems not to work yet, i say it seems because i mainly do only HA e Raids by now, greetings at all๐Ÿ‘‹๐Ÿ‘‹
  25. Hello everyone, totally agree, my long story in the game is very similar, (it is different only in the incomparable skill of Helmut in the use of SS๐Ÿ˜„), I started about 18 months ago, I still remember the nightmare of "to vetting "the Pallada CL when they needed 1200 points and no one knew any upgrades, I never consumed a single repair or a single smoke for the first year, I managed spending little (but spending) to have 2 BB120, 5 Nations in 5 Fleets fun and confortable and many "digital friends", all this was wiped out with a disarming arrogance, and even with a dose of "deception", when you (Devs Team) announced the release of the new nations (they had to go out in June 2018), being Italian I immediately bought the premium in gold to prepare better for the release of the hypothetical "Regia Marina", which has been denied; now according to you developers I should start all over again, preparing all the ships in 5 useless nations, nations that can not join any Fleet, no thanks, personally I'm taking the projects, I build ships but not prepare anymore nothing bigger than a CAs (excluding the "Darth Vader ship" ๐Ÿ™‚ that by now I'm almost finished), I'm not so "crazy" to remake thousands of stupid online battles all the same and monotonous to get a ship that maybe will be overcome by a new one in a few months; I agree with Helmut, only the Raids remain as amusing and cooperative phase among the players, which can be improved with little, it would be enough to draw from the huge tank of the more than 200 ships putting them in the raids in random mode, so as to always have some nice raids with total surprises, even in my complete ignorance I think it would be technically easy, but unfortunatly, as usual, anyone heard our little advices, me too think be end of jorney, and i would like to remind those still enthusiastic about this literally binge (useless and meaningless) of new ships that takes from two weeks to a month for "vetting" any one "4000" ship (without spend gold, of course), so how many do you really think you can use until new "revolution" of 130/140 levels ships cancels everything again???, and this will be the ultimate "reboot" or again, again.....think about this too, greetings at all